GAO Confirms It: 340B Hospitals and Contract Pharmacies Profit from Low-Income, Uninsured Patients
Some of the report’s most startling revelations confirm our worst fears about how hospitals and pharmacies are abusing the 340B program.
Here are two especially dispiriting findings from the GAO’s analysis:
- 16 out of 28 hospitals (57%!) did not provide discounted drug prices to low-income, uninsured patients who filled prescriptions at the hospital’s 340B contract pharmacy. Seriously?!?
- Many 340B contract pharmacies can earn excessive profit margins of 15% to 20% from brand-name 340B prescriptions. As I have long suspected, large, publicly-traded pharmacies are sharing in the 340B discounts generated for covered entities.
The 340B program’s apologists will have a hard time rebutting the uncomfortable facts from this GAO report. Calling something a “drug discount program” apparently doesn’t mean that the neediest patients get access to those discounts. Read on, and prepare to be outraged.
P.S. In two upcoming articles about 340B, I’ll review the pharmacies participating in the program and then examine the role of specialty pharmacies and pharmacy benefit managers.
Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Tuesday, July 10, 2018
Labels: Hospitals, 340B, Health Care Policy, Pharmacy, Specialty Drugs, Pharmacy Economics










