Analysis

The latest Drug Channels commentary — PBMs, 340B, specialty pharmacy, and the contracts that move the money.

Showing 1851–1860 of 2721

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

  • Drugstore Industry Profits Rise Again in Latest Gov't Data

    Time once again for my annual look at the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Retail Trade Report. These government-collected data provide the most complete picture of revenues at all store-based retail drugstores, not just the larger public companies.

    Once again, the Census data show that retail drugstores’ financial position looks better than you may expect. Highlights:
    • In 2011, total drugstore gross profits were $54.6 billion in 2011, up $1.5 billion (+2.8%) vs. 2010. Since 2000, drugstore’s gross profits have increased by $21.2 billion.
    • Gross margins (gross profits as a % of sales) averaged about 26% from 1993 through 2006, and averaged about 24% from 2007 through 2011.
    As we enter the last major phase of the generic wave, how long will the good news last for the pharmacy industry? Feel free to add your prediction in the comments.

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Tuesday, June 25, 2013

    Labels: Industry Trends, Pharmacy, Pharmacy Economics

Monday, June 24, 2013

Friday, June 21, 2013

  • Crazy Rumor of the Week: CVS + Celesio?

    Is CVS Caremark (NYSE: CVS) planning further overseas expansion?

    According to a German business magazine, CVS Caremark has been chatting with Celesio, one of the Big 3 EU pharmaceutical wholesalers. See Celesio Said to Have Held Talks With CVS on Cooperation. Here is the original story (I think): Verkaufsgespräche über Celesio.

    An acquisition seems unlikely, given the limited synergies between U.S. drugstore retailing and EU wholesaling. Recall that the Walgreens-Alliance Boots deal was motivated by a potent combination of financial economics and Stefano Pessina's personal ambitions. That said, the global generic purchasing scale of CVS-Celesio would rival the Walgreens-Alliance Boots-AmerisourceBergen deal. Hmmm.

    While all sides are denying everything, the article's details seem just a bit too specific to be pure speculation. Big deals have a funny way of motivating more deals. Stay tuned.

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Friday, June 21, 2013

    Labels: Wholesalers, International Drug Channels, Mergers and Acquisitions

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

  • With a Top Secret Letter, HRSA Blesses Amgen’s New 340B Distribution Plan

    Here’s some crucial 340B news—along with a perfect illustration of why the 340B drug discount program urgently needs fundamental reform and oversight.

    Amgen just announced that Neulasta purchases by 340B covered entities must be made exclusively from such specialty distributors as AmerisourceBergen’s ASD Healthcare business. Despite loud protests from the Safety Net Hospitals for Pharmaceutical Access (SNHPA), the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has reportedly decided that Amgen’s distribution plan “will not violate the 340B statute.”

    This is a major decision for all pharmaceutical manufacturers that provide discounts to 340B entities. Want to know about HRSA’s guidance? Too bad.

    Following in the sad footsteps of other barely-accountable government bureaucracies (IRS, NSA, Justice Department), HRSA has labeled its decision “top secret” and won't release any regulations or public rulemaking about manufacturer distribution strategies. Instead, HRSA continues to operate the 340B program through a tangle of sub-regulatory guidance that is not readily available for public comment or review.

    Read on to learn more about Amgen's plan, SNHPA's complaints, and HRSA's "decision."

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Wednesday, June 19, 2013

    Labels: Channel Management, Health Care Policy, 340B

Friday, June 14, 2013

Thursday, June 13, 2013

  • NADAC Momentum: California Abandons Average Acquisition Cost for Pharmacy Reimbursement

    You may recall that California was in the process of transitioning Medi-Cal pharmacy reimbursement from the Average Wholesale Price (AWP) benchmark to an Average Acquisition Cost (AAC) benchmark. Would it be Heaven or would it be Hell? Alas, we’ll never know if a CA AAC is a lovely place, because California’s Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) just announced that the its plan is being put on hold. Click here to read the official DHCS statement.

    Does this change mean slowing momentum for acquisition cost pharmaceutical benchmarks? I don’t think so. Instead, California actions implicitly endorse the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) data now being collected and published by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). California wants CMS to take the political hits (and spend the money) to build a new U.S. pharmaceutical pricing benchmark.

    The pharmacy industry may want to stab CMS’s efforts with their steely knives, but they shouldn't want to kill this beast. As I see it, they should actually be breaking out the pink champagne (on ice) for cost-based reimbursement, which essentially guarantees pharmacy profits. Read on and let me know if you agree.

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Thursday, June 13, 2013

    Labels: Average Acquisition Cost (AAC), Health Care Policy, Costs/Reimbursement, Pharmacy Economics

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

  • Catamaran Sails Away with Cigna’s PBM: Deal Analysis

    Last night, Cigna (NYSE: CI) ended months of speculation by announcing a 10-year PBM partnership with Catamaran (NASDAQ: CTRX). Check out the oddly-titled press release, which somehow omits Catamaran’s name from the headline: Cigna Retains and Builds On Success of Pharmacy Business Delivering Market-Leading Value to Customers. Or, click here to listen to the Catamaran conference call.

    Catamaran wins big from the deal, because it (1) gains at least $5 billion in incremental revenues, (2) removes a major uncertainty about its business, and (3) can now credibly be called one of the Big PBMs. Cigna’s business will transition to Catamaran over the next 24-36 months.

    By structuring the deal as an outsourcing arrangement, Cigna is showing confidence in the independent PBM model. The Catamaran-Cigna relationship looks more like CVS Caremark-Aetna outsourcing deal than the Express Scripts-Wellspring quasi-acquisition. Notably, Cigna did not follow UnitedHealth’s OptumRx strategy of insourcing the entire PBM.

    Read on for my perspective on the deal.

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Tuesday, June 11, 2013

    Labels: Wholesalers, Mergers and Acquisitions, PBMs

Monday, June 10, 2013

  • Medicaid Drug Rebate Program

    I want to remind you about IIR’s 18th Annual Summit on the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP), being held in Chicago, Illinois on September 9-11, 2013.

    New for 2013 are four never-before-heard pharma case studies from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Acorda Therapeutics, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. The 2012 MDRP Summit sold out so you should register soon. The 2013 agenda looks very strong, so I expect this year's event to be extremely popular, too. IIR is already projecting more than 500 attendees.

    Drug Channels readers can register with promo code XP1858DRC and save $400 off the standard registrations rates. Thanks, IIR!

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Monday, June 10, 2013

    Labels: Sponsored Post

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

  • Profits in the 2013 Fortune 500: Wholesalers, PBMs, and Pharmacies vs. Manufacturers

    Time once again for my annual review of the latest Fortune 500 list. Here, I explore the relative profitability of the largest drug wholesalers, chain pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and pharmaceutical manufacturers. I also compare these groups with independent pharmacies. These data will help you understand how drug channel intermediaries make money.

    Key observations from the new Fortune list:
    • Drug channel companies have higher revenues than pharmaceutical manufacturers, so they rank higher on the Fortune 500. This results from quadruple-counting of prescription revenues within the channel. See my explanation below.
    • Drug channels companies are profitable. When their profits are measured by Return on Sales, profits of wholesalers, PBMs, and pharmacies are only one-tenth of manufacturer profits. But when these profits are measured by Return on Assets, channel company profitability is about half that of pharmaceutical manufacturers.
    • For the second straight year, investors earned higher returns from drugmakers than from the drug channels group. However, the drug channels group has still outperformed manufacturers over the past 10 years.
    • The profitability of a typical independent pharmacy is higher than the profitability of the eight largest drug channels companies, including PBMs. Sorry to be the bearer of...good news?
    You’ll find the the technical notes are at the bottom. Add a comment or opinion. Enjoy!

    Posted by Drug Channels Institute, an HMP Global company on Wednesday, June 5, 2013

    Labels: Wholesalers, Channel Management, PBMs, Pharmacy, Pharmacy Economics